Bookmark and Share

January 18, 2012

Should Congress Censor the Web?

I personally do not know a lot about the upcoming vote and how exactly a yes vote will censor the internet.  For those that of you that may be wondering what I’m referring to, I’m referring to the SOPA and the PROTECT IP Act.  Congress will be voting on these acts January 24th.  From what I understand the acts are suppose to help fight piracy on the internet.  However, there are many businesses that feel this will hinder the thrive the internet gives their business.  Want to see examples?  Just check out www.google.com or www.firefox.com.  They currently have voiced their opinion on the issue on their main page.

If what Firefox and Google reports is accurate, the US government will have unprecedented control over the internet (both within and outside the country).  Firefox and Google feels this will hinder our freedom of speech on the internet.  But that in of itself brings up an interesting question.  When the freedom of speech was put into the constitution, the internet did not exist.  Should the internet receive the same freedom as our verbal speech is?  Is our written word any different than our typed word?  As far as I know the press still falls under the freedom of speech, so why should the internet be any different?  Those who think our government is becoming more of a socialist minded government will definitely see that in this move.  Why do I say that?  The same censorship the US Government wants to put into place is currently used by China, Iran, and Syria.  

Feel free to comment below.  If this is not now, it will be a hot topic.

December 29, 2011

Some interesting iOS news

Now that Christmas is over and the New Year is upon us.  Cnet reports that iOS users are up to 5million free app downloads per day.  That number is expected to increase as the results only include up until November of this year.  Full Story

iOS devices also likely came in 1st among mobile activations, beating android by approximately 1.6million activations this holiday season.  I personally was suprised to hear that iOS surpassed android in activations once I learned android surpassed the iPhone this year in market share.  Numbers do not show how many of which iOS device but did include the iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad.  Numbers also excluded the new Kindle Fire from Amazon.  Full Story

New hack has been released to jailbreak the iOS 5.0.1.  However, developers are expected to soon release software update 5.1 which would likely revert any changes the jailbreak puts in place.  Full Story

Got a new iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, or Mac for Christmas?  Need to learn more about the new iCloud and it’s match feature?  Check out what Apple has to say here or read the Full Cnet Story

This concludes my summary of the latest iOS news.  Hope you enjoyed and feel free to post any comments or questions below.

December 28, 2011

Received an email? Did you check it twice? Better find out if it’s naughty or nice….

Filed under: Security Ramblings,Social Ramblings — AndrewSmither @ 4:01 pm

Okay, I know, Christmas is over, but I couldn’t help myself.  Besides most people listen to Christmas music until the New Year.  We have talked a lot about various e-mail security from phishing to making sure you have a good password.  Sometimes e-mails are just a plain hoax even though it came from an e-mail address you might have already receieved legitimate e-mail from.  The latest in the news?  Cnet reports that a bogus e-mail was sent to New York Times subscribers.  The e-mail informed the subscribers that their subscription has been canceled and they would receive up to 50% off if they renewed.  Once New York Times learned of the hoax e-mail they responded via Twitter, informing everyone it was a fake.  Here is the original e-mail:

“ Dear Home Delivery Subscriber,

Our records indicate that you recently requested to cancel your home delivery subscription. Please keep in mind when your delivery service ends, you will no longer have unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our NYTimes apps.

We do hope you’ll reconsider.

As a valued Times reader we invite you to continue your current subscription at an exclusive rate of 50% off for 16 weeks. This is a limited-time offer and will no longer be valid once your current subscription ends.*

Continue your subscription and you’ll keep your free, unlimited digital access, a benefit available only for our home delivery subscribers. You’ll receive unlimited access to NYTimes.com on any device, full access to our smartphone and iPad» apps, plus you can now share your unlimited access with a family member.

To continue your subscription call 1-877-698-0025 and mention code 38H9H (Monday-Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m.; Saturday, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. E.D.T.).”

 

Be sure to check that e-mail twice, even from a legitimate e-mail address and/or company.  If you’re being informed your subscription has been canceled and you did not, check out the company’s website, Facebook page, or Twitter to see their response.  Or even call the number you have previously on file and check.

 

Source: Bogus e-mail sent to New York Times subscribers

December 27, 2011

Bloggers Tier Drawing Results ARE IN!

Again, we CANNOT thank you all enough for helping make Blog Contest 11.11 the biggest and best blog contest that we have had so far!  As a thank you, ALL contestants (both Bloggers and Promoters) are entitled to a complimentary Premium AAA US Atlas!

Congratulations to the three contestants that won in the Bloggers Tier.  You’ll have to watch the video to find out who they are!

Remember that if you are 1st, you get first pick at the prizes for your tier, second, second pick, and third, third pick.

For those in the Promoters Tier, the drawing has already taken place.  If you missed the results please see Promoters Drawing Results

Want to look at the final standings google doc one more time?  You can view it HERE.

Bloggers Tier Drawing Taking Place any minute!

Attention all Blog Contest 11.11 contestants in the Bloggers Tier.  Your entries are being put into the “hat” now and the drawing will take place within minutes!  The first “ticket” pulled will allow that person to get first pick at the prizes, the second “ticket” pulled will allow that person to pick second, and so on.  We are pulling 3 tickets for each tier.  A big thank you to all of you who helped promote this contest, get the word out, and most of all added valuable content to our site!  Good Luck!

Missed the final standings?  Check em out HERE.

For those in the Promoters Tier, the drawing has already taken place.  If you missed the results please see the previous post: Promoters Drawing Results

 

Promoters Tier Drawing Results Are In!

We CANNOT thank you all enough for helping make Blog Contest 11.11 the biggest and best blog contest that we have had so far!  As a thank you, ALL contestants (both Bloggers and Promoters) are entitled to a complimentary Premium AAA US Atlas!

Congratulations to the following three contestants in the Promoters Tier:

1. Janet K

2. Sarah L

3. Lauren B

 

Remember that if you are 1st, you get first pick at the prizes for your tier, second, second pick, and third, third pick.

Want to look at the final standings google doc one more time?  You can view it HERE.

Blogger Tier Drawings will be done next!

Promoters Tier Drawing Taking Place any minute!

Attention all Blog Contest 11.11 contestants in the Promoters Tier.  Your entries are being put into the “hat” now and the drawing will take place within minutes!  The first “ticket” pulled will allow that person to get first pick at the prizes, the second “ticket” pulled will allow that person to pick second, and so on.  We are pulling 3 tickets for each tier.  A big thank you to all of you who helped Promote this contest and get the word out!  Good Luck!

Missed the final standings?  Check em out HERE.

December 24, 2011

*OFFICIAL Final Blog Contest 11.11 Standings!*

You read the title right!  Just in time for Christmas the Final Update to our standings has been completed!

A big thank you to all of you for making this the biggest and best blog contest yet!

Congratulations to the top three contestants in each category:

Bloggers

  1. Peter W
  2. Kyle E
  3. Rodney M

Promoters

  1. Sarah L
  2. Janet K
  3. Rodney E

If your name is listed above, please contact Kordel Eberly to receive your gift card for placing in the top three within your category.

To see the Final Standings and see how many entries you earned for the drawing check out the google doc HERE!

Blog Contest 11.11 Drawings will take place next week.  We will do a drawing for each category.

 

above picture taken from Teen Girl Squad on homestarrunner.com

 

December 22, 2011

How young is too young when talking about cellphones?

I’m guessing I’m a little more conservative than the average person on this subject, but I think it’s better to wait as long as possible before giving your child a cellphone.

While I recognize that it can be a nice convenience for busy parents and families with hectic schedules, I think it also can turn into a huge distraction for kids and it opens a whole can of worms in terms of social interaction for children at a time when they may not need to be connected every moment to their peers (just watch adults and how they interact on their phones).

In particular, I am not a fan of elementary or middle school age children having their own cellphones, and I’ll touch on that later. Many people, me included, think that the idea of a high school student owning a phone can be a good idea. “When you give your child a cellphone you are giving him or her a lot more freedom and access to a social life that can’t be supervised,” said Marybeth Hicks, editor of Family Events, a newsletter for families and moms, which I recommend if you have children, and author of two books on parenting. “A lot of parents are blindsided by some things that come up as a result of kids using cell phones, and the truth is they are the ones providing that access.”

Hicks, who has four children, said she recommends that kids get their first cellphone in high school.

“Getting a cellphone is a rite of passage in our house,” she said. “It’s something my kids get in the summer between eighth grade and their freshman year of high school.”

Hicks said that giving her children their first cellphone is a sign of their growing independence and maturity that comes along with entering a new chapter of adolescence. It also provides that “electronic” tether to home. Her children know that once they have that cellphone they are expected to call her if they find themselves in a situation in which they aren’t comfortable with what’s going on around them. With a phone in hand, there’s no excuse for not calling mom when they’re at a party without any parental supervision or where other kids might be drinking alcohol or doing drugs.

I mostly agree with Hicks philosophy, and so I think that under 13 years old is a bit young to give a child a cellphone of her own. Again, I know lots of people do it, and I am not passing judgement. I just think that kids today will have a lifetime of gadgets and cellphones (see previous blogs regarding changing technology) and it won’t hurt them to wait another few years before getting one of their own.

Instead, I’d recommend using an old phone or a cheap feature phone as a “family” phone that can be kept on the family cell phone plan for $10 a month and loaned out to any child in the family on an as needed basis.

For example, you could give your 11 year old daughter the “family” phone if she is going to the movies or a middle school dance, so she can call you when she needs a ride home. But I think it’s probably unnecessary for her to have her own phone to text message her friends. While I don’t think that all text messaging between tweens is bad, it’s an interaction that you as a parent are not able to monitor in real time. I think the biggest proponents for allowing kids cellphones is to ease our fears for our kids when they are alone. I feel that this alleviates that by giving them that “security” but not allowing them to have the full features of a smartphone.

So, what is the appropriate age for a cellphone? That’s my recommendation under 13. But what about older kids? When is it appropriate to get your kid a phone, and when should you consider getting your child a smartphone?

Life was much easier for parents a few years ago when cellphones did one thing, made phone calls. But now with smartphones, kids can get full access to the Internet on their phones. While this can be a great thing, especially for adults, when you’re searching for a nearby restaurant or need directions to your doctor’s office, as a parent, it adds another element of risk for your children who now have access to all kinds of inappropriate content in their pockets.

If you feel comfortable allowing your child to have open access to the Internet and to social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, on your home computer, then you can consider allowing a smartphone. Again, I would suggest that this kind of access is not appropriate for elementary or middle school children, but more for an older teenager, who is more mature.

It’s hard to put an exact age on this, but I’d say that if you follow my philosophy a pre-paid type phone would be appropriate as a first cellphone for when a child first enters high school. And a smartphone might be more appropriate for a junior or senior in high school. Again, I think you need to consider the maturity of your child when deciding at what age to allow a smartphone. Now…also take into consideration that it is my opinion that this child should be held partially responsible for paying for the phone and/or the monthly fees that go along with it. This not only teaches the responsibility of having a phone of their own, but just as important it teaches them the importance of financial responsibility.

If you take my advice, be careful when you’re shopping for a phone for your child. To complicate matters further, the distinction between regular feature phones and smartphones is quickly fading. And wireless operators are making it more difficult to find bare-bones phones for wireless subscribers. Instead, they are trying to steer customers, whether they are adults or children, into devices that use more data services, which means more access to the Internet and social networking services like Facebook and Twitter.

Not only does it provide access to services and content you may not want your kids accessing, it also costs more money. So beware.

If you can’t find the most basic, no-frills cellphone that doesn’t offer any access to the Internet while you’re shopping for a phone, you can still consider a pre-paid phone that can be purchased at most major retailers like Walmart and Target. But if you don’t want to enable access to the Internet, make sure you check out the parental control options through the carrier you are using to shut off access to the Internet. The bigger nationwide carriers all offer some parental controls, but check out their websites for specifics or ask the salesperson for more information.

These “quick messaging” devices featured on many carrier Websites can be a good choice if you’re willing to use the parental controls for several reasons. First, they serve as a perfect gateway between a regular feature phone and a smartphone. With parental controls, you can limit access to services like data, as well as limit when they can access the phone and which numbers they can call. But as your child matures, you can allow more access through the control Website. So your son or daughter can get more functionality as he or she matures.

The second reason these phones are great is that they are inexpensive to buy and own. Often you can get one for free or for less than $50 with a two-year contract. And if you restrict the data service, you don’t need to subscribe to an additional data plan.

These devices also appeal to kids because they come in cool colors, and most of them have full QWERTY keypads or touch screens, which are great for text messaging and accessing social networking sites.

Some good examples of these phones are the Verizon Wireless’s Samsung Intensity II, which Verizon markets it as “one intensely social phone.” It has a slide-out QWERTY keyboard for quick messaging and it has Facebook and Twitter integrated into the device for fast access to those services. It also can work with Verizon’s V CAST Music with Rhapsody service, which costs extra. (This service can also be restricted through the parental control settings.)

Verizon also has the LG Cosmos 2, which is free with a two-year contract. It has QWERTY keyboard and 1.3MP camera and also offers access to Facebook and Twitter.

AT&T also has a lot of these “quick messaging” devices, such as the Samsung Solstice II, which has a QWERTY keyboard and a touch screen. It comes free with a two-year contract from AT&T. Or another QWERTY phone, the Samsung Evergreen.

Verizon and AT&T have several phones in this category and they frequently change their special offers, so check on the Website or at a retail store for the best deals.

Controlling what your child can and cannot access on a smartphone gets a little trickier. Apple has a pretty good set of parental controls for iOS devices, which includes the iPhone. So you could restrict the downloading of certain apps or you could turn off the Safari Internet browser altogether. But you’ll still be paying for the data plan. And while voice minutes can be shared in a family plan, data usage cannot. So when you add smartphones to a family plan or you add data to a “quick messaging” feature phone, every line requires its own data plan. And these charges can really add up.

What’s more, new smartphone subscribers on AT&T and Verizon Wireless, the two largest wireless providers, cannot get unlimited data service. So there is a risk that your child could run over the usage cap, especially if you’re an AT&T subscriber and plan on getting the 200MB plan for $15 a month. (Most users, even kids, should be fine with the AT&T 2G service for $25 a month or Verizon’s 2GB plan which costs $30 a month.)

If cost is your primary concern, then prepaid services might be a better option for some families. You can get basic feature phones for calling and texting, as well as inexpensive smartphone plans. Services, such as Virgin Mobile and MetroPCS offer full fledged Google Android smartphones for $100 or less. And you can get a plan for as little as $35 a month from Virgin Mobile. The service includes unlimited texting and data with 300 minutes of talk time. MetroPCS offers unlimited voice, texting and data for $40 a month.

With prepaid services, you won’t have to worry about your teenager exceeding the talk, texting or data usage limits, since they can’t exceed their monthly limit. But the downside is that you won’t have the ability to control the service and usage as much through parental control settings as you would through a bigger carrier. Hopefully this information helps you if you are the parent of a son or daughter that has been asking for a phone or like me have kids approaching the age where it start becoming a topic of consideration.

http://www.marybethhicks.com/

http://support.verizonwireless.com/video/product/managing_vzw_service/What-is-the-Parental-Controls/index.html

www.att.com

December 12, 2011

Newsflash: anything a cell network can do, the Internet can do better and cheaper

Ok we have seen the ads for Magic Jack Phones (19.99 for the year) and Vonage about cutting the cord with your regular phone company, well now it is time to say goodbye to your cell company.  Republic Wireless is unveiling a super cheap, $19-a-month, no-contract, unlimited-talk, data, and text cell phone plan meant to blow away the mobile market.  Having used both Magic Jack and Vonage I was impressed that a Cell company was going to push the talk over the internet.  Works well for the Land Lines.

 

Republic Wireless is a mobile network startup is based in Cary, N.C., and is owned by Bandwidth.com, a growing telecommunications provider. The company can provide such low rates because it expects most calls to be carried over Wi-Fi networks, in customers’ homes and elsewhere. It requires customers to have access to at least one Wi-Fi network. Calls get carried by Sprint’s cellular network only when a Wi-Fi network isn’t available. According to Republic Wireless, most people are around Wi-Fi networks 60% of the time.

 

Republic wireless is offering The LG Optimus (for $199), running Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) for 19.00 a month.  It is a hybrid of phones and will use the internet while you have an available wireless connection.  For roaming they are buying blocks of time from Sprint.  Looks interesting so I started to look a bit deeper.  They claim it is unlimited but you could consume 550 minutes, send 150 texts, and download 300 megabytes of data without crossing the community’s fair use threshold. Anything over that on Cell Usage you will be reminded of the guidelines and to what extent you’ve crossed the fair use threshold. Republic Wireless will provide you with tips for reducing your cellular footprint and plenty of opportunity to get back on track. When they contact you about your usage, they will let you know how much time you have to correct your problem. But if you look closer at that they are not talking about the usage on the Wireless Internet.

 

I’m ready to give it a try as they have a 30 day guarantee but so many people are jumping to give it a try that I’m on a waiting list.  Maybe by January I will hear something from.  Hope this catches on and that they can make a go of it.  What do you think the other mobile phone vendors are thinking about them?  Are you ready to try it?

 

http://www.republicwireless.com

Older Posts »
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Related Sites | SpyderMap | Web Portal | Exchange Links | Affiliates